In this episode, Craig discusses:
The highlights of this newsletter are available as a podcast, which is also
called AI Goes to College. You can subscribe to the newsletter and the
podcast at https://www.aigoestocollege.com/. The newsletter is also
available on Substack: (https://aigoestocollege.substack.com/).
Welcome to AI goes to college, the podcast that helps
higher education professionals navigate the changes brought on
by generative AI. I'm your host, Dr. Craig Van Slyke.
The podcast as a companion to the AI goes to college
newsletter, you can sign up for the newsletter at AI goes to
college.com/newsletter.
In this episode, I talk about my view of the future of generative
AI. Talk about how I use Claude to check an exam, which turned
out pretty well actually. And I also talk about an interesting
new AI extension for Chrome, one that I think has a lot of
promise. So let's get started.
So what's the future of generative AI? It's not been
quite two years. So about a year and a half, really, since open
AI released chat GPT. And we've come a long way since then. But
I think it's time to start thinking about what the future
of generative AI is going to look like. I know a lot of
people are thinking about this, a lot of people are writing
about this. So I'm gonna give you my view, the first thing
that I think will happen is that AI will fade into the
background, it will go from being this thing that we're
talking a lot about, to something that just is it's just
there, the chat bots are all well and good. They're very
useful. They're very flexible, but they require too much
expertise to use, especially for complex topics, or complex
tasks.
Sasha agrees with me, I don't know if you heard her there in
the background. So I really think that what's going to
happen is we're going to see these tools, I call them task
based AI, that just do something they help you screen your
emails, they help you refine your writing, they keep you on
top of your task list, you know, whatever it might be.
The GPT store that opened up not too long ago is a step in that
direction. Custom GPT is can be really useful, especially when
they're well designed. If you want to just have some fun,
check out one called Cosmic dream, it creates some pretty
trippy images, it's a lot of fun to play around with, I created a
simple GPT to help with this newsletter, there really isn't
very complicated. It just gives Chet GPT some context so that I
don't have to enter that context. Every time I want to do
something related to the newsletter. Ai enabled tools
take this much, much further. For example, I use one called
caste magic to create all sorts of material for my podcasts,
Otter AI, which I think I've talked about before, is really
awesome at transcribing audio summarizing, zooms. Summary
feature is another example, Grammarly. The list goes on and
on and on. And it's growing every day. So here's a good
example. I think one that doesn't exist to my knowledge.
What would it be like for those of you who are faculty, if there
was a really good AI test generator, you record your
lectures, give it access to your notes, or textbook chapters, set
some parameters, and click on Go. So, before too long, you'll
have an exam with really solid questions ready for printing or
uploading to your Learning Management System, or whatever
you do. I think those kinds of tools could free higher ed
professionals, faculty and staff from a lot of drudgery. It's
something I called Moving humans up the stack, which just means
that AI can do the boring semi mindless work that so many of us
hate freeing us up to do more engaging interesting parts of
our job. Maybe you're different, but I hate developing and
grading exams. So alright, let's move on. I think the AI enabled
tools have almost endless possibilities. So that's step
number one in the future of AI, or the first thing I want to
mention. My next prediction is that we'll see a significant
increase in the use of AI agents, an agent and an AI tool.
They're really kind of hard to separate. An agent does
something on your behalf. Siri and Alexa are kind of agents.
But I'm talking about something different here. I'm talking
about things that perform specific tasks as sets of
workflows. And I realized I'm being a little bit confusing
here because it is very, very messy. So for example, an AI
agent can scan your email inbox and classify messages into
different topics. Or maybe an AI agent might scan student
admissions applications, and extract key data and
automatically enter that into an admission system. I'd love a
highly capable AI agent that could just grade homework or so
alignments.
So again, I know that the line between tools and agents is a
little bit fuzzy. So let me give you some key characteristics of
AI agents, AI agents mostly operate autonomously with
limited human intervention. I think that's a big difference
between what I was talking about with tools and agents. AI agents
are task oriented and typically limited in scope. So they have
one narrow thing that they do. AI agents are embedded in
workflows. So it's generally not like a chat bot, where you do a
bunch of things with it, it's just kind of there. And when
it's its turn to do something it doesn't. AI agents are often
embedded in application. So you may see it as part of a textbook
publishers app or as part of an admission systems app. That sort
of thing. Using AI agents doesn't require any real
expertise in AI. No prompt engineering. In fact, you may
not even know that you're using AI agents. And here's a big one
that I'll talk more about later, AI agents can be combined. So
these agents will be operating behind the scenes. As I've said
a couple of times, you may not even be aware they're running.
Although you may trigger the agents use or use its output
without really realizing it. When these are all refined, I
think these agents are going to be massively valuable. But
building and refining them is going to take a lot of effort
and considerable resources. That's one reason I see most of
these coming from large vendors. All right, so let's talk about
my third prediction agent to agent networks. This is where
the real power of AI agents will come. From networks of agents
working together just like organizations, networks of
people can accomplish really great things working together
more than they can separately, networks of AI agents will be
capable of some amazing things. Imagine if you had an AI agent
network that continuously scans your inbox sending messages off
to other agents for further processing, your email
processing agent recognizes an email from a student who needs
advising. So it hands off the message to your advising agent
who coordinates with the university's class scheduling
agent to find out what relevant classes are being offered in
future terms. Then the scheduling agent passes this
information back to the advising agent, who figures out what the
student should do and sends this information to your email
composition agent who writes a response and sends it to the
student, maybe after you review it. Except for the review. All
of this happens without you doing a thing. That can be
pretty sweet. Of course, there are risks, you're putting a lot
of trust in the agents. Man, there are places where this
could go pretty horribly wrong. But a smoothly working agent
network could be a wonderful thing.
Okay, there's more to this. But I think you've kind of got the
point. So my vision of the future of generative AI as a
shift from Ai chatbots to AI embedded tools, the rise of AI
agents and networks of AI agents taking on complex workflows. Of
course, I might be wrong about all of this AI is to say the
least dynamic area. Nobody really knows what the AI
landscape will be even a couple of years from now, maybe not
even a couple of months from now. It's an exciting time, it's
going to be an interesting future. And it has a lot of
potential. Maybe to free many of us higher ed professionals from
some dreaded, drudgery. least that's what I'm hoping to see.
But time will tell.
Normally, it takes me quite a bit of time to scan for
duplicate questions in questions that are hard to understand. I
was reasonably confident of the quality of the questions on this
exam, but I needed to double check.
I might pass this off to my GA but I really didn't want to do
it in this case, because the turnaround time was so quick and
that wasn't fair to him. So I decided to use Claude three Opus
to do the checking. First thing I did was create a PDF version
of the exam when uploaded to Claude. You know, there's some
privacy concerns with this, but I wasn't really worried about
Claude having my exam questions and there was no personal data
involved. So I want to hit
that I put in a pretty simple prompt. Please analyze the
attached exam for two areas, unclear questions, and duplicate
questions.
And the newsletter which is available at AI goes to
college.com I have a screenshot of clods response course I don't
have the actual questions in there, I've kind of blurred
that. It gave me a list of unclear questions, but Claude
didn't really know some of the context that the students would
have. So the questions really weren't, weren't bad. So I
didn't make any modifications. I could have given Claude more
context, but it really wasn't necessary in this case. So for
example, Claude thought a question about the differences
between requirements and goals and decision making was unclear.
But I'd spent a lot of time on this in class, so I'm sure the
students would understand the questions, at least the ones who
were paying attention. It didn't identify any duplicate
questions, which was good. So I decided since this had gone
pretty well, I was going to take it another step. This time I
asked Claude to check the exam against the study guide. I give
extensive study guides and promise my students that have a
concept isn't included in the study guide, it won't be on the
exam. Now the questions aren't on the study guide. But the
topics are. For example, the study guide might say compare
and contrast requirements and goals in the context of decision
making. But the exam includes multiple choice question on the
differences between requirements and goals. Now, checking the
exam against the study guide isn't hard, but it's kind of
tedious. So I asked Claude to do it for me. I put in another
another pretty simple prompt. Thanks, I'll wait. Thank you i
ai. Please compare the exam to the attached study guide. Are
there any questions on the exam that relate to topics not on the
study guide? Note that the study guide does not contain specific
questions for the exam. Rather, it covers topics that students
should know. And Claude went through did its thing and raised
a few potential mismatches. But after I reviewed these consider
these concerning questions, I decided that the questions were
fine clods concerns were reasonable. But really, human
judgment was required to make the final decision about whether
or not the questions recovered in the study guide. Since I was
already pretty confident about the exam, I felt entirely
comfortable using Claude to do the checking. But I if I were
you, I would run a couple of experiments before fully
trusting AI with this sort of a task. The big message here is
that Claude made a couple of tedious tasks much more
palatable. It also saved me about an hour, maybe an hour and
a half of time, which was nice at the end of a long day. So if
you have some tasks you find mundane and tedious, see if you
can find a way to get AI to help free you from that drudgery.
That seems to be the word of the day drudgery. But remember, when
all of a sudden done, you're still responsible for your work.
By the way, if you want some help in figuring out how AI can
reduce some pain points, feel free to contact me, Craig at AEI
goes to college.com. By the way, I love to talk about this stuff.
So I'm happy to come to your campus to put on a workshop give
a little talk, we can do something virtually doing this
on a number of campuses in the next few months. So if you're
interested again, send me an email Craig at AI goes to
college.com. Alright, we're gonna wrap up with an
interesting new tool called Harpa. That's H ARP a.ai. It's a
Chrome extension that integrates AI into your web browser. Harper
can use a bunch of different AI models, but the normal chat
based interface seems to use GPT 3.5. But you can also connect it
to Claude and Gemini. For me, harpist main use is to summarize
webpages, but it has some other functions as well, maybe too
many, it's a little overwhelming. Here are a few
summarizing web pages, generating content, including
email messages based on a webpage, monitoring websites for
changes, extracting YouTube transcripts, that could be handy
extracting data from websites. And there's a whole lot more.
All of this goes from a Chrome browser window, which is pretty
handy. So it's kind of tough to do here on a podcast. But if you
go to the newsletter, which once again is available at AI goes to
college.com/newsletter. I run through an example and it works
pretty well. Right now there's a lifetime deal on Harpa. I think
it's $240, which isn't bad. harpaz pricing structure is kind
of odd and a little bit confusing. Most people from what
I can tell would probably be fine with what they call their
ex membership, or subscription that's their lifetime deal. Or
their s one which is a monthly membership. You can go to
harpa.ai and find out the pricing for yourself and decide
what's what's good for you. All right, well that's it for this
time. I hope you got something out of this episode. If there's
anything you'd like for me to talk about, feel free to send me
some suggestions. Craig at AI goes to college.com And
remember, you can subscribe to the newsletter and I goes to
college.com/newsletter. All right, I'll talk to you next
time. Thank you. Thanks for listening to AI goes to college.
If you found this episode useful, you'll love the AI goes
to college newsletter. Each edition brings you useful tips,
news and insights that you can use to help you figure out what
in the world is going on with generative AI and how it's
affecting higher ed. Just go to AI goes to college.com to sign
up. I won't try to sell you anything and I won't spam you or
share your information with anybody else. As an incentive
for subscribing. I'll send you the Getting Started with
generative AI guide. Even if you're an expert with AI, you'll
find the guide useful for helping your less knowledgeable
colleagues